"Red" can mean any number of different varieties. Does she mean red as in Rhode Island Red? Red as in New Hampshire Red? Red as in Red Leghorn (not a black tailed variety)? How about Red Chantecler, not recognized but still different from the first three. I'm pretty sure there are even more "reds" in the Standard. Red Pyle is totally different genetically than any of these reds. I wonder if she knows that? And why would a "conservancy" be interested in something that has never been recognized or perhaps even perfected in the first place? The following statement from one of her websites is enough to give me pause:
"Birchwood Conservancy shares consistent objectives with the UN" Lest we forget, the U.N. is the organization that places countries like North Korea and Iran on their Human Rights Council.