I did read the standard before, but many of the terms are too vague for me, as a beginner, to know what to look for. Many traits are described with adjectives like \"moderate\", \"medium\", \"expressive\", \"small\", \"full\", etc. These leave an awful large amount of interpretation, especially for someone with little experience.
I have also seen the National meet photos before, but to the untrained eye, it is not easy to see why one is good compared to another.
Mine have no yellow on the legs. They do have white skin. That stuff is easy to see. However, whether it\'s neck is properly arched or if the eyes are expressive, is beyond me at this point. Jean mentions that the color of it\'s eyes is not right, but I can\'t even find that in the standard. I would also guess that it\'s difficult to evaluate a 12 week old bird to the standard, which I\'m guessing is for adults. Very confusing right now...